Well I�ll be a condom�s uncle!
What else are we gonna find out from this so-called paragon of virtue Sandra Fluke that has become The Left�s version of Mother Teresa and Florence Nightinggale?
The Other McCain reports rather belatedly, we are becoming aware that this supposedly typical Georgetown coed is not very typical at all:
[B]irth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if �gender reassignment� surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.
The title of the article . . . is �Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons� and was published in the Journal�s 2011 Annual Review.
Remember, as Byron York previously reported, Fluke was rejected as a last-minute substitute witness at a Feb. 16 committee hearing because staffers for Chairman Issa were unable to discover Fluke�s claim to expertise relevant to the subject of the hearing. This law school journal article is the sort of thing that might have been discovered about Fluke�s background, had the Democrats who put Fluke forward as a witness done so with the usual 72-hour advance notice. Here�s one brief quote from the article:
I can�t wait to hear the next revelation of Sandra Fluke-Warrior Princess for free contraception and sex changes.
The Last Tradition is fast becoming one of the most popular political blogs on the net. Don�t miss out on the fun and tell a friend.